<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>richard-slater.co.uk &#187; Misc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/category/misc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk</link>
	<description>Jesus, Life, Programming and Systems Administration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OneNote vs Evernote</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2010/02/27/onenote-vs-evernote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2010/02/27/onenote-vs-evernote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sys. Admin.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhere in the middle of 2007 I was encouraged to use OneNote to clear my desk and move to a &#8220;paperless&#8221; system, initially this was a little painful as it seemed a gargantuan task to scan in all of the bits of paper on and around my desk that appeared to contain useful information. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere in the middle of 2007 I was encouraged to use <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneNote' title='Wikipedia article on OneNote'>OneNote</a> to clear my desk and move to a &#8220;paperless&#8221; system, initially this was a little painful as it seemed a gargantuan task to scan in all of the bits of paper on and around my desk that appeared to contain useful information.</p>
<p>As it turned out I realised that if a bit of paper was covered by another (or in fact covered by anything) it wasn&#8217;t that important to the execution of my role and could probably be thrown in the bin.</p>
<p>At the time I was not using Microsoft Office at home, opting to use <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice' title='Wikipedia article on OpenOffice'>OpenOffice</a> for the limited needs I had for productivity software. I did however want a better way of organising my paperwork at home, OneNote 2007 came in at about £70 which isn&#8217;t unreasonable for what you got. Then I discovered <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evernote' title='Wikipedia article on Evernote'>Evernote</a>.</p>
<p>Seemed perfect, I don&#8217;t generate so much paperwork that I would bust the 40mb/month limit on the free account. In the end I decided to adopt Evernote at home and continue to use OneNote at work, it proved quite a handy separation of work and life.</p>
<p>Recently I have run into two problems that are pushing me towards using Evernote for everything, and ditching OneNote entirely:</p>
<ol>
<li>Evernote handles PDFs really well, you drag them in and they are displayed using the Foxit rendering engine. It just works. OneNote on the other hand plain old embeds them into the note, great now how is that different from having them in a folder in My Documents.</li>
<li>Evernote 3.5 has vastly improved the synchronization mechanism meaning that I can safely put something on Evernote on my PC and it will be on my laptop shortly after it is turned on next. Microsoft has tried to get this kind of functionality into OneNote and <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SharePoint' title='Wikipedia article on SharePoint'>SharePoint</a> however it just doesn&#8217;t work that well, it is too slow and there seems to be a 10 minute refresh cycle hard coded into the product.</li>
</ol>
<p>I am still not sure that I want to ditch OneNote entirely, the 2010 version has some nice labour saving devices built in such as quick screen clippings and image formatting with the fluid user interface. Nothing in OneNote 2010 screams &#8220;don&#8217;t leave me&#8221; though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2010/02/27/onenote-vs-evernote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Commands I Use Every Day</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/09/08/5-commands-i-use-every-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/09/08/5-commands-i-use-every-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sys. Admin.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my regular day job I am a Systems Administrator, my team and I manage a network with 7 servers and approximately 600 workstations, 200 laptops and 2500 users. All clients are Windows XP SP2 or SP3 and all servers are Windows 2003 SP2 or Windows 2003 R2 SP2. I am sure I am not alone in knowing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my regular day job I am a Systems Administrator, my team and I manage a network with 7 servers and approximately 600 workstations, 200 laptops and 2500 users. All clients are <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP' title='Wikipedia article on Windows XP'>Windows XP</a> SP2 or SP3 and all servers are <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2003' title='Wikipedia article on Windows 2003'>Windows 2003</a> SP2 or Windows 2003 R2 SP2.</p>
<p>I am sure I am not alone in knowing least 5 commands that I use day in and day out to manage workstations or servers on the network. I thought I would take the time to share some of these with you now.</p>
<p><span id="more-362"></span></p>
<p><strong>dirquota</strong></p>
<p><em>Windows 2003 R2 Only</em></p>
<p><em></em></p>
<p>dirquota is part of Windows 2003 R2 File Server Resource Manager (&#8220;FSRM&#8221;) which I use to manage quotas on home areas and shared folders. dirquota is the command line mechanism for managing the quota portion of FSRM, with the number of users we have it is important that we can modify quotas quickly, something the FSRM Quota GUI is not good at.</p>
<p>There I two basic forms I use every day:</p>
<p><em>dirquota quota list /path:&lt;path&gt;</em></p>
<p>Simply enough this will create a report for the path including peak usage, current usage and quota limit along with dates and times useful when determining what to do with the quota. Usefully the verbs <em>quota </em>and <em>list </em>can be abbreviated to <em>q</em> and <em>l</em> respectively, which saves a bit of typing.</p>
<p>The second form is to modify quotas:</p>
<p><em>dirquota quota modify /path:&lt;path&gt; /limit:&lt;limit&gt;</em></p>
<p>The command does what is expected; modifies the quota on the path to the specific limit. Again the verbs <em>quota </em>and <em>modify </em>can be abbreviated to <em>q </em>and <em>m</em>, in addition the limit parameter can be expressed in units, f.ex, 50MB, 500MB, 1G, 20G.</p>
<p><strong>robocopy</strong></p>
<p><em>All Windows Platforms</em></p>
<p><a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robocopy' title='Wikipedia article on Robocopy'>Robocopy</a> (or Robust Copy) is the <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Army_Knife' title='Wikipedia article on Swiss Army Knife'>Swiss Army Knife</a> of file copy tools while it doesn&#8217;t have a GUI it is more than capable of doing taking on any copy job. Originally part of the Windows Server Resource Kit it is not a standard command in <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista' title='Wikipedia article on Windows Vista'>Windows Vista</a> and <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2008_Server' title='Wikipedia article on Windows 2008 Server'>Windows 2008 Server</a>.</p>
<p>Typing &#8220;robocopy /?&#8221; at the command line might be slightly overwhelming however there is one boiler plate command that will do the job.</p>
<p><em>robocopy &lt;source&gt; &lt;destination&gt; /E /ZB /COPY:DAT /R:3 /W:10 /XJ /XF *.tmp ~$*.doc</em></p>
<p>&lt;source&gt; and &lt;destination&gt; can be local paths, mapped drives or UNC paths.</p>
<ul>
<li><em>/E</em> &#8211; copies files and folders recursively including empty folders, if you want to exclude empty folders replace /E with /S.</li>
<li><em>/ZB</em> &#8211; copies files in restartable mode, if that fails due to an access denied error then use backup mode, this will require administrator access to work, use /Z if you are not running as an administrator.</li>
<li><em>/COPY:DAT</em> &#8211; copies only <strong>D</strong>ata, <strong>A</strong>ttributes and <strong>T</strong>imestamps useful when taking a copy to move to a new file system and re-apply permissions from scratch. Check the help pages for information about other options.</li>
<li><em>/R:3 /W:10</em> &#8211; Retry three times, wait 10 seconds between tries. Important if you have an Anti-Virus product configured to scan on access as you may get System Error messages when trying to access these files.</li>
<li><em>/XJ</em> &#8211; Exclude Junction Points. Very important for Windows Vista as the user profile &#8220;Application Data&#8221; folder points to itself causing recursive and eventually failing copy operations.</li>
<li><em>/XF &lt;filespec&gt;</em> &#8211; Exclude Files. There is rarely any point in copying temporary.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>wuauclt /detectnow</strong></p>
<p><em>All Windows Platforms</em></p>
<p>wuauclt stands for <strong>W</strong>indows <strong>U</strong>pdate <strong>A</strong>utomatic <strong>U</strong>pdate <strong>Cl</strong>ien<strong>t</strong>, yes it is a bit of a mouth full, /detectnow is a simple operation to kick off the Windows Update client to detect if updates are required rather than relying on the detection schedule.</p>
<p><strong>dsquery, dsmove</strong></p>
<p>The Active Directory Users and Computers (ADUC) <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Management_Console' title='Wikipedia article on Microsoft Management Console'>Microsoft Management Console</a> Add-on is sufficient for the majority of Active Directory operations. There are situations where it is useful to be able to script an operation, for example the mass moves of objects from one location to another.</p>
<p>I tend to use <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Excel' title='Wikipedia article on Microsoft Excel'>Microsoft Excel</a> to to transform a text file report to a list of directory commands, most recently I moved all laptops that had not accessed the domain for the past six weeks to an &#8220;Lost Computers&#8221; OU. At which point I disabled the computer account through ADUC.</p>
<p><em>dsquery computer -name LTA3-44 | dsmove -newparent &#8220;ou=Lost Computers,dc=domain,dc=co,dc=uk&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>icacls</strong></p>
<p><em>Windows Vista, Windows 2003 SP2 and Windows 2008 Only</em></p>
<p>icacls is the long awaited replacement to cacls and xcacls providing command line access to modifying Windows <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS' title='Wikipedia article on NTFS'>NTFS</a> <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_Control_Lists' title='Wikipedia article on Access Control Lists'>Access Control Lists</a>. icacls provides more flexibility that cacls and xcacls making it a essential skill to learn for manageing mass permission changes on disks with many different users.</p>
<p><em>icacls /grant DOMAIN\rslater:(OI)(CI)F /T</em></p>
<ul>
<li>/grant DOMAIN\username &#8211; grants the specified permission to this user, /deny is also an option however one to be careful of.</li>
<li> <img src='http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> OI)(CI) &#8211; not some strange smiley, but means <strong>O</strong>bject <strong>I</strong>nherit, <strong>C</strong>ontainer <strong>I</strong>nherit, applies only to directories and means files and folders within the folder will inherit permissions from the folder.</li>
<li>/T &#8211; recurse directories.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Final Thought</strong></p>
<p>Every Systems Administrator, Programmer, Hacker, Scripter and Helpdesk Operator must have at least 5 commands that make their life easier, if you have posted about these commands on your blog please do leave a link in the comments. Equally if you think of a command while reading this blog entry feel free to post it in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/09/08/5-commands-i-use-every-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter by SMS is no more</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/08/18/twitter-by-sms-is-no-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/08/18/twitter-by-sms-is-no-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Europe at least, Twitter was unable to come to an agreement with mobile phone operators to continue to send incoming Tweets to mobile phones via SMS, at least one person thinks that SMS is a deceptively profitable service for the network operators. Surely services that use SMS are going to generate more revenue as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe at least, <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter' title='Wikipedia article on Twitter'>Twitter</a> was <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2008/08/changes-for-some-sms-usersgood-and-bad.html">unable to come to an agreement</a> with mobile phone operators to continue to send incoming Tweets to mobile phones via <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS' title='Wikipedia article on SMS'>SMS</a>, at <a href="http://nick.piggott.name/blog/2008/08/18/twitter-and-the-realities-of-sms/">least one person</a> thinks that SMS is a deceptively profitable service for the network operators. Surely services that use SMS are going to generate more revenue as people pass funny Tweets onto non-Twitter users.</p>
<p>After all, all of those jokes that zip round like wildfire whenever something happens in the news aren&#8217;t just the creative juices of the masses expressed in a short message, they are <a href="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=11513">written by the networks</a> to encourage people to send more messages (by passing the jokes on).</p>
<p>All is not lost however, I have been using <a href="http://www.jtwitter.com/">jTwitter</a> for a long time and it does a great job of keeping me up to date on the move. The Twitter API seems good enough to allow anyone too interface with the service without extensive programming knowledge &#8211; I suspect we will see more services that allow access to Twitter from a mobile phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/08/18/twitter-by-sms-is-no-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call of Duty 4:Modern Warfare</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/01/03/call-of-duty-4modern-warfare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/01/03/call-of-duty-4modern-warfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call of Duty 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PunkBuster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/01/03/call-of-duty-4modern-warfare/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bought the game last week, finished the single player campaign a couple of days ago. It plays more like being in a film than a game, which for me is great, as a cinematic experience it is superb, the game play is better than any other game I have played before (which doesn&#8217;t say much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought the game last week, finished the single player campaign a couple of days ago. It plays more like being in a film than a game, which for me is great, as a cinematic experience it is superb, the game play is better than any other game I have played before (which doesn&#8217;t say much really &#8211; have been out of touch of the FPS market over the past few years).</p>
<p>The multiplayer is great fun too. I had some initial issues connecting in the first place due to PunkBuster connect issues, resolved them by <a href="http://www.evenbalance.com/index.php?page=pbsetup.php">updating PunkBuster manualy with PBSetup.exe</a> then running the game as Administrator under Vista 64.</p>
<p>All in all, great game &#8211; well worth the spend, and brought a lot of enjoyment to my Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2008/01/03/call-of-duty-4modern-warfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2007/09/01/home-networking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2007/09/01/home-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sys. Admin.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HomePlug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2007/09/01/home-networking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeing as Catherine and I finally bought our own house and it looks like we might be staying here for much longer than we have ever stayed anywhere else, we are looking at options for home networking, our current solution involves a 802.11b Wireless Network for laptop connectivity and a cable for my PC, that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing as Catherine and I finally bought our own house and it looks like we might be staying here for much longer than we have ever stayed anywhere else, we are looking at options for <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/home_network' title='Wikipedia article on home network'>home networking</a>, our current solution involves a <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11b' title='Wikipedia article on 802.11b'>802.11b</a> Wireless Network for laptop connectivity and a cable for my PC, that has to be removed each night to close the living room door. <span id="more-66"></span></p>
<p><em><strong>The Options</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>1) Wireless Network</strong> &#8211;  802.11g provides a maximum wire speed of 54<abbr title="Megabits Per Second">mbps</abbr> which results in a typical throughput of 25-27<abbr title="Megabits Per Second">mbps</abbr>, our existing 802.11b network gives us a typical throughput of about 4<abbr title="Megabits Per Second">mbps</abbr> which is below that of our broadband service (6.6<abbr title="Megabits Per Second">mbps</abbr> &#8211; <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_Internet' title='Wikipedia article on Zen Internet'>Zen Internet</a> <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADSL_Max' title='Wikipedia article on ADSL Max'>ADSL Max</a> Service)</p>
<p>In terms of costs Amazon has a <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys' title='Wikipedia article on Linksys'>Linksys</a> Wireless-G  Router <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Wireless-G-Broadband-Router-SpeedBooster-802-11g/dp/B0002LHXB6/ref=pd_bbs_6/202-4455070-0355030?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1188640547&amp;sr=8-6">for £38.00</a>, we would need to spend a further <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Linksys-WMP54G-Wireless-G-PCI-Adapter/dp/B00008DOYL/ref=pd_bbs_sr_5/202-4455070-0355030?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1188640547&amp;sr=8-5">£14.99</a> for a Wireless-G PCI Card. There may be cheaper options available and I expect shopping around would get the cost in at about £50.</p>
<p><strong>2) Wired Network</strong> &#8211; <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_5' title='Wikipedia article on Cat 5'>Cat 5</a> or ideally <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_6' title='Wikipedia article on Cat 6'>Cat 6</a> provides the fastest speeds available, as we can implement <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet' title='Wikipedia article on Gigabit Ethernet'>Gigabit Ethernet</a> giving us a theoretical throughput of 125MB/sec although some of this is lost due to TCP/IP overheads. To be fair with only one computer Gigabit is not required, all of my existing equipment is <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100BASE-TX' title='Wikipedia article on 100BASE-TX'>100MB/sec</a> compatible. The main cost will be the installation of the wires which would be require going through two walls and covering about 30 metres of wire.</p>
<p><a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maplin' title='Wikipedia article on Maplin'>Maplin</a> sells <a href="http://www.maplin.co.uk/Search.aspx?criteria=L84AX&amp;DOY=1m9">Cat6 at £99 for 305m (~33p/meter) or 79p per meter</a> of custom lengths, wall plates, of which I would need two of to cable between my computer and the utility room, are available from Maplin for <a href="http://www.maplin.co.uk/Search.aspx?criteria=UW17T&amp;DOY=1m9">£4.49</a>, a crimp tool comes in at <a href="http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=99612&amp;C=Maplin&amp;U=SearchTop&amp;T=CRIMP&amp;doy=1m9">£21.99</a> and a <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/punch_down_tool' title='Wikipedia article on punch down tool'>punch down tool</a> at <a href="http://www.cablecity.co.uk/product_info.php?products_id=600">£12.95 from Cable City</a>. In total this comes to £67.62.</p>
<p><strong>3) <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_line_communication' title='Wikipedia article on Power line communication'>Power line communication</a> / HomePlug Network</strong> &#8211; this is a fairly new technology and there is no official standard so interoperability between manufacturers is not good now, and is not guaranteed in the future. These devices suffer from interference generated from the products connected to them, so for example anything that &#8220;dirtys&#8221; the <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ring_circuit' title='Wikipedia article on ring circuit'>ring circuit</a>, i.e. speakers, amps, desk fans, vacuum cleaners, will affect performance.</p>
<p>Prices range from Solwise 85Mb HomePlug at <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Solwise-85Mb-Homeplug-Ethernet-Adapter/dp/B000I7J85I/ref=pd_bbs_1/202-4455070-0355030?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1188644973&amp;sr=8-1">£27.22</a> adapter to a Solwise 200Mb HomePlug adapter at <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Solwise-NET-PL-200AV/dp/B000KY3B5C/ref=pd_bbs_13/202-4455070-0355030?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1188644973&amp;sr=8-13">£50.61</a>, other than a selection of cables to connect between the adapters and the sockets you don&#8217;t need anything more than the adapters.</p>
<p><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Summing Up</strong></span></em></p>
<p><em>Price</em></p>
<p>Of the three options the Wireless Network is cheapest, closely followed by the HomePlug Network then the wired network, it could be argued that you could borrow the crimp and punch down tools making the wired network cheapest at £41.14.</p>
<p><em>Extensibility</em></p>
<p>The wired network is the least flexible by far, further connections require further runs of cable and terminating boxes, you can future proof to an extent by buying lots and lots of cable and using a <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_Panel' title='Wikipedia article on Patch Panel'>Patch Panel</a> at the hub of your network. HomePlug networks can be extended by adding extra HomePlug kits, they should all work together as long as they are similar products, however it is still unsure as to what would happen when a product is no longer available, without clearly defined standards it is difficult to tell, there is however a <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePlug_Powerline_Alliance' title='Wikipedia article on HomePlug Powerline Alliance'>HomePlug Powerline Alliance</a> who define the specification for HomePlug 1.0. The Wireless network is the most extensible as there is no practical limit to the number of people you can have on your network, most Wireless Routers and <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Access_Points' title='Wikipedia article on Wireless Access Points'>Wireless Access Points</a> support 25 or more users.</p>
<p><em>Latency</em></p>
<p>Being a gamer, and particuarly an online gamer means that <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lag' title='Wikipedia article on Lag'>Lag</a> or <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latency' title='Wikipedia article on Latency'>Latency</a> are important to me, higher latency means that things I do in a game take longer to reach the server, so the lower the latency the better. Wired networks come out by far the best, along my existing 100MB Cat5e cable I get &lt;1<abbr title="milliseconds">ms</abbr> response times to the <a class='wikipedia' href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/router' title='Wikipedia article on router'>router</a>, on the 802.11b wireless network I get about 3-5<abbr title="milliseconds">ms</abbr> response times. HomePlug networks claim that they are low latency, however without one to test I can not say how low it actually is.</p>
<p><em>Finally</em></p>
<p>I have not decided what I want to go for yet, I am leaning towards the wired network for the low latency properties, however this HomePlug network has peaked my interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2007/09/01/home-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/09/02/new-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/09/02/new-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/09/02/new-computer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at getting myself a new computer so I have come up with a setup which looks good, we will have to see if I can afford it however. 1x Abit AN8 SLi nForce4 SLi (Socket 939) £102.17 Reasons: SATAII RAID for future proofing, SLI for future expansion 1x ThermalRight XP-120 £39.89 Reasons: Never faulted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="postbody">Looking at getting myself a new computer so I have come up with a setup which looks good, we will have to see if I can afford it however.</span></p>
<p>1x <span style="font-weight: bold">Abit AN8 SLi nForce4 SLi (Socket 939) </span><span style="font-style: italic">£102.17</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: SATAII RAID for future proofing, SLI for future expansion</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">ThermalRight XP-120 </span><span style="font-style: italic">£39.89</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Never faulted previous models</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">Vantec SF12025L Stealth 120mm fan </span><span style="font-style: italic">£9.34</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Quiet yet fairly high (59) CFM</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Venice 90nm (Socket 939)  </span><span style="font-style: italic">£149.17</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Good &#8220;bang for your buck&#8221;</span><br />
2x <span style="font-weight: bold">Corsair 1GB DDR XMS3200C2PT </span><span style="font-style: italic">£187.88</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: 2GB for MMOGs, overclockable</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">Lian-Li PC-60 PLUS Silver Aluminium Midi-Tower Case  </span><span style="font-style: italic">£93.94</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Looks Good (dumb reason)</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">Tagan TG430-U15 430W ATX2.01 Easycon SLi Compliant Modular Silent PSU </span><span style="font-style: italic">£56.34</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Pleanty of power for future proofing, detachable cables</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 NCQ 160GB ST3160827AS SATA 8MB Cache </span><span style="font-style: italic">£62.22</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Seagate&#8217;s quiet and fast in my experence, NCQ</span><br />
1x <span style="font-weight: bold">Leadtek WinFast GeForce 6800 256MB DDR TV-Out/DVI </span><span style="font-style: italic">£146.82</span><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px; line-height: normal">Reasons: Good &#8220;bang for your buck&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Total: £847.77</span></p>
<p>Any comments appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/09/02/new-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London Bommings</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/07/27/london-bommings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/07/27/london-bommings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/07/27/london-bommings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am listening to the BBC Radio 5 Live feeds from the house of commons about the London Transport Blasts, it seems very little is known a unknown islamic group seems to of claimed responsability for the blasts however no one is sure if they can be beleived.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="postbody">I am listening to the BBC Radio 5 Live feeds from the house of commons about the London Transport Blasts, it seems very little is known a unknown islamic group seems to of claimed responsability for the blasts however no one is sure if they can be beleived.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/07/27/london-bommings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr Who</title>
		<link>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/06/16/dr-who/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/06/16/dr-who/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/06/16/dr-who/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excited dosn&#8217;t even begin to explain how I am feeling about the climax of the current series of Dr. Who; I am not going to be able to watch it on the night so that is going to get to me even more knowing that I am going to have to wait an extra day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="postbody">Excited dosn&#8217;t even begin to explain how I am feeling about the climax of the current series of Dr. Who; I am not going to be able to watch it on the night so that is going to get to me even more knowing that I am going to have to wait an extra day to see the end of the series.</p>
<p>The thought that this episode explains how Christopher Eccleston comes to an end as The Doctor? how the Daleks managed to survive the time war? are the time lords still in existance? Aaagh so many questions.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richard-slater.co.uk/archives/2005/06/16/dr-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
